
\begin{table}[H]
\begin{center}
\begin{small}
\begin{tabular}{l D{.}{.}{4.5} D{.}{.}{4.5} D{.}{.}{4.5} D{.}{.}{4.5}}
\toprule
 & \multicolumn{1}{c}{External Efficacy} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Satisfaction with Democracy} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Internal Efficacy} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Political Interest} \\
\midrule
Group 2                 & 0.01       & 0.01       & 0.15^{**}  & 0.08       \\
                        & (0.06)     & (0.05)     & (0.07)     & (0.06)     \\
Wave 2                  & -0.01      & 0.00       & 0.12       & 0.12^{**}  \\
                        & (0.06)     & (0.05)     & (0.07)     & (0.06)     \\
Group 2 $\times$ Wave 2 & -0.18^{**} & -0.16^{**} & 0.01       & 0.02       \\
                        & (0.09)     & (0.08)     & (0.11)     & (0.08)     \\
(Intercept)             & 3.05^{***} & 3.73^{***} & 3.17^{***} & 3.32^{***} \\
                        & (0.04)     & (0.04)     & (0.05)     & (0.04)     \\
\midrule
R$^2$                   & 0.01       & 0.01       & 0.01       & 0.01       \\
N                       & 2038       & 2045       & 2036       & 2050       \\
\bottomrule
\multicolumn{5}{l}{\tiny{\footnotesize $^{***}p<0.01$; $^{**}p<0.05$; $^{*}p<0.1$}}
\end{tabular}
\end{small}
\caption{The effect of losing eligibility. Presented estimates capture the results from DiD-specifications comparing groups 1 and 2 across waves1 and 2. Based on a birthdates sample with bandwidth 300.}
\label{table:coefficients}
\end{center}
\end{table}
